ªk¡@³W¡@³ø¡@¾É
Laws and
Regulations
1¡B¶T©ö§½¤½§i¼W¦C¡u¥ú¸n¦¡°ßŪ°O¾ÐÅé´¹¤ù¡vµ¥³f«~p¤»¶µÀ³²Å¦X´¹¤ù¼Ð¥Ü¿é¥X³W©w¡A¦C¤J¡u©e°U¬d®Ö¿é¥X³f«~ªí¡v¡A§¡¦Û¤E¤Q¦~¤@¤ë¤@¤é°_¹ê¬I¡C
¸gÀÙ³¡°ê»Ú¶T©ö§½¨Ì¾Ú´¼¼z°]²£§½¨Ó¨ç¤Î¸Ó§½³f«~¤ÀÃþ©eû·|·|ij¨Mij¡A©ó89¦~11¤ë29¤é¥H¶T¡]¤K¤E¡^¤Gµo¦r²Ä¤K¤E¡³¤G¡³¡³¤T¤T¤K¤K¸¹¨ç¡A¤½§i¦p¦¸¨Æ¶µ¡G
(1)¡u¤¤µØ¥Á°ê¶i¥X¤f³f«~¤ÀÃþªí¡v¼W¦C¢Ñ¢Ñ¢Ñ¤K¤¥|¤G¡E¤@¤E¡E¤@¡³¡E¤@¡³- ¥|¡u¥ú¸n¦¡°ßŪ°O¾ÐÅé´¹¤ù¤§³æ¥Û¼Æ¦ì¿nÅé¹q¸ô´¹²É¤Î´¹¶ê¡vµ¥¤Q¤G¶µ³f«~¡A§R°£¢Ñ¢Ñ¢Ñ¤K¤¥|¤G¡E¤@¤E¡E¤@¡³¡E¡³¡³ - ¤»¡u¨ä¥L³æ¥Û¼Æ¦ì¿nÅé¹q¸ô´¹²É¤Î´¹¶ê¡vµ¥¤»¶µ³f«~¡C¨ä¤¤¼W¦C¤§¡u¥ú¸n¦¡°ßŪ°O¾ÐÅé´¹¤ù¡vµ¥³f«~p¤»¶µÀ³²Å¦X´¹¤ù¼Ð¥Ü¿é¥X³W©w¡A¦C¤J¡u©e°U¬d®Ö¿é¥X³f«~ªí¡v¡A§¡¦Û¤E¤Q¦~¤@¤ë¤@¤é°_¹ê¬I¡C
(2)¢Ñ¢Ñ¢Ñ¤K¤¥|¤G¡E¤@¤E¡E¤@¡³¡E¤@¡³-¥|¡u¥ú¸n¦¡°ßŪ°O¾ÐÅé´¹¤ù¤§³æ¥Û¼Æ¦ì¿nÅé¹q¸ô´¹²É¤Î´¹¶ê¡vµ¥¤»¶µ³f«~¤§¿é¥X³W©w¥N¸¹¡u¤¤C¥|¡v¡]¼W¦C¡^¡A¤º®e¬°¡G¡u—A¿é¥X¥ú¸n¦¡°ßŪ°O¾ÐÅé´¹¤ù¡]Mask-ROM¡^¡A°£¥~³f´_¹B¥X¤fªÌ¥~¡AÀ³¼Ð¥Ü´¹¤ù¼Ð°O¡C—B³qÃö¥X¤f®É¡A¥X¤f¤HÀ³À˪þ¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½»{¥i¤§¾÷ºc©Ò¥X¨ã¤§´¹¤ù¼Ð¥Üµn¿ýÃÒ©ú®Ñ¼v¥»¡A¨ÃÀ³©ó¥X¤f³ø³æ¦Û¦æ¾Ú¹ê³ø©ú°Ó«~¤ÀÃþ¸¹¦C¡B³f¦W¤Îµn¿ýÃÒ©ú®Ñ¸¹½X¡A¥Ñ®üÃö¨Ì¨ä¥Ó½Ð¦C¤J¡u¤å¥ó¼f®Ö³qÃö¡v¡]C2¡^©Î¡u³fª«¬dÅç³qÃö¡v¡]C3¡^¡A¥¼¨Ì³W©w³ø©úªÌ¡A¼t°ÓÀ³¦Ûtªk«ß³d¥ô¡C—C¥X¤f¤H¦C©ó¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½´£¨Ñ¤§µn¿ý¼t°Ó²M³æ¤ºªÌ¡A¤£»ÝÀ˪þ´¹¤ù¼Ð¥Üµn¿ýÃÒ©ú®Ñ¼v¥»¡C¡v¡C
1.BOFT Adds Six Items to Customs Examina-tion List
In response to a letter from the Intellectual Property Office and a resolution of the Com-
modity Classification Committee, the Board of Foreign Trade promulgated the following measures¡G
a. Twelve items have been added to the Cla-
ssification of Import and Export Commodi-
ties of the R.O.C. under CCC code 8542.19.
10.10-4, "monolithic IC chips and wafers for mask-ROM memory chips," while six have been deleted under CCC code 8542.19.10.00-
6, "other monolithic IC chips and wafers." The six items added under "mask-ROM memory chips" are to conform to the chip-marking system and be listed in the Table Of Export Goods For Customs Examination from 1 Janu-
ary 2001.
b. The six items under CCC code 8542.19.10.
10-4, "monolithic IC chips and wafers for mask-ROM memory chips," are now controlled under Export Regulation Code 574 (new), as follows: 1) Exported mask-ROM chips, with the exception of foreign goods to be resh-
ipped, shall be marked. 2) After Customs inspection, the exporter shall include a copy of the chip-marking Registration cer-
tificate from an IPO-approved agency, and shall declare the commodity classificat-
ion number, the commodity name, and Regis-
tration certificate number in the export manifest. Customs shall list items as doc-
uments examined and approved (C2) or goods examined and approved (C3). Firms shall bear liability for non-declaration. 3) Ex-
porters on the IPO list of registered expo-
rting firms are exempt from the requireme-
nt to include a copy of the chipmarking registration certificate.
¦æ¡@¬F¡@³ø¡@¾É
Administrative
Measures and Enforcement
2¡B§Ú°ê±NÁ|µo´¼°]Åv®×¥ó¯Ç¤J110³q³ø¨t²Î
§Ú°ê¬°¥´À»¤£ªkµsª©¬n·¡A³e¹ý¬F©²«OÅ@´¼¼z°]²£Åv¤§¨M¤ß¡A¯S³]¸m±M½u¹q¸Ü¡A´£¨Ñ24¤p®É³q³ø¨t²Î¡A±NÁ|µo«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥ó¯Ç¤J110³q³ø¨t²Î¡C
½t¦¹¡A¤º¬F³¡Äµ¬F¸p©ó¥»¡]90¡^¦~¤¸¤ë15¤é¨ç¥O©ÒÄݾ÷Ãö¡A¤µ«á¥Á²³©ÎÅv§Q¤H¥H110¹q¸ÜÁ|µo«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥ó®É¡A½Ð¨Ì¡uĵ¹î¾÷Ãö¨ü²z¦D¨Æ®×¥ó³ø®×³æ¤@µ¡¤f¹ê¬InÂI¡vº[¡u¥[±j«OÅ@´¼¼z°]²£Åv¤u§@¹ê¬Ipµe¡vµ¥¬ÛÃö³W©w¨ü²z°»¿ì¡A¤£±o©Úµ´¨ü²z©Î±À½Ó¡C
2.Taiwan "110" System to Include IPR Noti-fication
Taiwan is setting up a dedicated phone line to help counter trends toward IP piracy and carry out the government's determination to protect intellectual property rights. It will be a 24-
hour service and will include notification of IPR cases. On 15 January 2001, the National Police Administration of the Ministry of the Interior informed all subordinate bodies that when citizens or IP rights holders dial the "110" line to report IPR violations, cases sh-
ould be handled in accordance with the "Guid-
elines for Implementing 'One Stop' Handling of Reports on Criminal Activity by Police Agen-
cies" and the "Plan for Implementing Enhanced Protection of Intellectual Property Rights." Agencies were not to refuse or sidestep han-
dling of cases.
3¡B§Ú°ê¹p¼F·¦æ±½¿ºµsª©¥úºÐ
§Ú°ê«ùÄò¹p¼F·¦æ±½¿º¥é«_¦æ°Ê¡A°£¥Ñ¤º¬F³¡Äµ¬F¸p«O¦wĵ¹î²Ä¤GÁ`¶¤²Õ¦¨¥_¤¤«n¤TÓ¾÷°Ê¤p²Õ¡F¦¹¥~¡A¥t¥Ñ¦U¬ÛÃöÅv§Q¤H»P«e´¦¤TÓ°õ¦æ³æ¦ì°t¦X¡A²Õ¦¨¾÷°Ê¬d½r¤p²Õ¡A¥D°Ê¤£©w´Á¡B¤£©wÂI¦Ü¦U¥iºÃ¦aÂI¨Ìªk¬d¹î¨ú½l¡C
¸Ó¾÷°Ê¤p²Õ¦Û89¦~1¤ë24¤é¦Ü12¤ë31¤é¤î¡A¦@°õ¦æ¨ú½l«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥óp792¥ó¡A²¾°eÀ˹î¾÷Ãö°»¿ì¤§¶ûºÃ¥Ç¦@859¤H¡A¬dÀò¤§µsª©«~¤Î¥é«_«~Á`Èp¬ù·s¥x¹ô79»õ6¤d3¦Ê¾l¸U¤¸¡A¦¨ªGÂ׺ӡA¬d½r¤§¦¨ªG¦p¤U¡G
(1) ¦a¤U¤u¼t36¥ó¡A°_¥X¿N¿ý¾÷74¥x¡B«þ¨©¾÷3¥x¡B¹q¸£15¥x¤Î¹CÀ¸µs«þ¥D¾÷4¥x¡C
(2) µsª©¹CÀ¸¥úºÐ154¸U2¤d9¦Ê85¤ù¡C
(3) ¥é«_¹CÀ¸¥d§X6¸U4¤d4¦Ê51Ó¡C
(4) µsª©µ¼Ö¥úºÐ16¸U3¤d3¦Ê75¤ù¡B¿ýµ±a5¸U1¤d8¦Ê43¨÷¡C
(5) ¹q¸£µ{¦¡¥úºÐ5¸U¹s8¦Ê65¤ù¡B¹CÀ¸¤j¸É©«1149¤ù¡C
(6) µsª©¹q¼v¥úºÐ2¸U7¤d2¦Ê18¤ù¡B¥À·½126¤ù¡B¥ÀªO140¤ù¡B¼Ò¨ã1²Õ¤Î¦â±¡¥úºÐ5238¤ù¡C
(7) MP3¥úºÐ1426¤ù¡C
(8) °Ï°ìºô¸ô21¥x¹q¸£¥D¾÷¡C
(9) ¥é«_³Ò¤O¤h¤â¿ö250¥u¡B¥Ö¥ó483¥ó¡C
3.Taiwan continues sweep of pirated sof-tware discs
The current anti-counterfeiting sweep is c-
ontinuing, as the National Police Administ-
ration 2nd Police Division has formed three mo-
bile teams for the northern, central, and sou-
thern regions, which cooperate with IP rights holders to form inspection teams that make un-
scheduled raids on suspected violators at any location. From 24 January to 31 December, 2000, those teams engaged in raids in 792 cases of intellectual property infringement, arrest-
ing 859 suspects, and seizing pirated or coun-
terfeit goods with a total value of more than NT$7.96 billion. Results are summarized bel-
ow:
(1) .36 Underground production facilities wi-
th 74 CD burners, 3 duplicators, 15 comp-
uters and 4 hosts for game replication
(2) .1,542,985 pirated game discs
(3) .64,451 pirated game cartridges
(4) .163,375 pirated music CDs, 51843 audiota-
pes
(5) .50,865 CD-ROM software storage discs, 1149 game discs with multiple games
(6) .27,218 pirated DVD movie discs, 126 mas-
ters, 140 stampers, one mould set and 5238 CDs of pornographic material
(7) .1426 MP3 CDs
(8) .21 LAN servers
(9) .250 counterfeit Rolex watches; 483 leather goods
4¡B§Ú°êÄY¬d¨ú½l¨â©¤¤T¦a¥é«_¦êÁp¦æ¬°
§Ú°ê¬d½r¥é«_¦æ°Ê¡A±N±q°ê¤º©µ¦ù¦Ü¤j³°¤Î»´ä¡C¾Ú°]¬F³¡Ãöµ|Á`§½©xû¤é«eªí¥Ü¡A°w¹ï¥´À»¨â©¤¤T¦a·~ªÌ¥é«_¦êÁp¡A¬°¹F¦³®Ä¨ú½l¡A¸gÀÙ³¡°ê»Ú¶T©ö§½¤w¹ï¶T©öªk²Ä¤G¤Q¤K±ø¡A±N¥X¤f³f«~¹H¤Ï¬ÛÃö´¼°]ÅvºÞ²z³W©wªº¥X¤f¼t°Ó¡A¨ä¾A¥Î½d³òÂX¤j¸ÑÄÀ¡A¤©¥H©µ¦ù¦Ü¥Ñ¤j³°©Î»´ä¥X³f¤§¥xÆW±µ³æ¼t°Ó¡A¥H¥´À»¨â©¤¤T¦a¥é«_¦êÁp¦æ¬°¡C¦¹¥~¡A¯A¤Î¨â©¤¤T¦a¥é«_¦êÁp¤§¥xÆW±µ³æ¼t°Ó¸ê®Æ¡A¥Ñ®üÃö±N¨ä¦C¤J°ª¦MÀI¸s¼t°Ó¡A¥H¹ï¨ä¥X¤f³fª«¥[±j¬dÅç¡C
¤Wz¦b¥xÆW±µ³æ¡A¦Ó¥Ñ¤j³°©Î»´ä¥X¤f¦Ü¬ü°êªº¥é«_²£«~¦p³Q¬dÀò¡A«h¬ü°ê®üÃö·|±N¸Ó¥é«_®×¥ó¦C¬°¥xÆW¥é«_®×¥ó¡C¦]¦¹¡A§Ú¬F©²¹ï©ó¨â©¤¤T¦a¥é«_¦êÁp¦æ¬°«D±`«µø¡A»{¬°¥²¶·³]ªk¬d¸T¡A¥H§K¼vÅT¤¤¬üªºÂùÃä¶T©öÃö«Y¡C
¡]¥H¤W¸ê®ÆºK¦Û¤u°Ó®É³ø90¦~2¤ë19¤é³ø¾É¡^«ö¨Ì¶T©öªk²Ä¤G¤Q¤K±ø³W©w¡A¥X¶i¤f¤H«I®`§Ú°ê©Î¥L°ê¨Ìªk«OÅ@¤§´¼¼z°]²£Åvµ¥¬ÛÃö³W©w¡A¸gÀÙ³¡°ê»Ú¶T©ö§½±o¤©¥Hĵ§i©Î³B·s»O¹ô¤T¸U¤¸¥H¤W¤T¤Q¸U¤¸¥H¤U»@Áì©Î°±¤î¨ä¤@Ó¤ë¥H¤W¤@¦~¥H¤U¿é¥X¡B¿é¤J©Î¿é¥X¤J³f«~¡C¨ä±¡¸`«¤jªÌ¡A¸Ó§½°£±o¨Ì«e¶µ³B»@¥~¡A¨Ã±oºM¾P¨ä¥X¶i¤f¼t°Óµn°O¡C
Taiwan Includes Hong Kong, Mainland Chi-na in Anti-Counterfeiting Efforts
Taiwan's efforts to combat counterfeiting have moved beyond the shores of Taiwan to target firms with regional operations in Hong Kong and mainland China. The Board of Foreign Trade (BOFT) will reportedly expand the interpre-
tation of provisions in the Trade Law that sa-
nction exporters who export goods violating intellectual property laws to include Taiwan firms that receive orders for manufacture in Hong Kong and mainland China. In another meas-
ure intended to deal with regional counterf-
eiting operations, Taiwan companies which are suspected of accepting orders for the manufa-
cture of counterfeit goods in Hong Kong or ma-
inland China firms will be placed on a priority list by Customs for increased inspections of their exported goods.
(The above information excerpted from The Com-
mercial Times reported on 19 February 2001)
In a related development, the BOFT announced that pursuant to the Trade Law, firms which export or import goods that violate intell-
ectual property laws of Taiwan or other cou-
ntries would be subject to warnings, fines of NT$300,000 to NT$300,000, or suspensions of their import and export authorization of 1 to 12 months. For serious violations, the BOFT said that it would revoke firms' importer and exporter registrations in addition to impos-
ing fines.
5¡B§Úªñ¤@¦~¨Ó¿é¬ü³Q¬d¦©¤§¯A¶û«I®`´¼°]Åv²£«~ª÷ÃB¹d´T´î¤Ö
®Ú¾Ú¬ü°ê®üÃö¤½§G¤§2000¦~·|p¦~«×¡]1999¦~10¤ë¦Ü2000¦~9¤ë¡^²Îp¸ê®Æ©ÜÅS¡A¥xÆW¼t°Ó³Q¬d¦©¤§¯A¶û«I®`´¼°]Åv²£«~ª÷ÃB¦@¬ù600¸U¬ü¤¸¡A¦ûÁ`ÃB14¢M¡A³Q¬d¦©³Ì¤j©v³f«~¬°¹q¸£µwÅé¤Î¹s¥ó
¡A¨ä¦¸¬°¥ú¾Ç´CÅé²£«~¡C
¸Ó²Îp¨Ã«ü¥X¡A2000¦~·|p¦~«×¥xÆW¼t°Ó³Q¬d¦©¤§¯A¶û«I®`´¼°]Åv®×¥ó¼Æ»P¤W¤@¦~¦P´Á¤ñ¸û¡A´î¤Ö4¥ó¡A¦ý¬O³Q¬d¦©¤§¯A¶û«I®`´¼°]Åv²£«~ª÷ÃB¡A«h¹d´T´î¤Ö¬°¤W¤@¦~¦P´Áªº1/7¡A¥Dn«Y¤W¦~«×¥e³Q¬d¦©Á`ÃB80¢Mªº¥ú¾Ç´CÅé²£«~¡A¦b¥»¦~«×³Q¬d¦©ª÷ÃB¹d´T´î¤Ö©ÒP¡C
5.U.S. Seizes Less Infringing Goods From Taiwan in 2000
According to statistics in the 2000 Yearbook of the U.S. Customs Service, the U.S. Customs in 2000 seized US$6 million worth of goods from Taiwan companies suspected of infringing int-
ellectual property rights. The amount was 14% of the total amount seized by U.S. Customs. The largest categories of Taiwan products seized by U.S. Customs in 2000 were computer hardware and spare parts followed by optical media pr-
oducts.
The report, which was based on statistics co-
vering the period of October 1999 through Se-
ptember 2000, indicated that U.S. Customs ha-
ndled four fewer cases of Taiwan firms susp-
ected of infringing intellectual property in 2000 than the year earlier with the total value of goods seized (declining by) 1/7. One of the principal reasons for the decline was the la-
rge reduction in the amount of optical media products seized. These goods had accounted for 80% of the goods seized in 1999 from Taiwan importers.
6¡B¤¤¬üÁp¤â¥XÀ»´£¤É¬d¸T¥é«_®Ä¯q
§Ú°ê¬F©²ªñ¦~¨Ó¿n·¥¹B§@±À°Ê½lµ²¡u¤¤¬üÃö°È¦X§@¨ó©w¡v¡A¤w©ó¥»(90)¦~1¤ë17¤é§¹¦¨Ã±ÂÐ,¬O¶µ¨óÀò«Y¥H«Ø¥ß¤ÎºûÅ@¤¤¬üÂù¤è®üÃö¥DºÞ¾÷Ãöªº·¾³qºÞ¹D¡A¨Ã¶i¦æ¥´À»¥Ç¸o§Þ³N»P¸ê®Æ¥æ´«¡A¥H´£¤É¬d¸T¥é«_®Ä¯q¡C
6.Taiwan, U.S. Sign Customs Agreement
Taiwan and the United States an agreement to promote cooperation and assistance between their customs administrations. Both countries promised in the agreement to promote better communication channels and efficiency in dea-
ling with their customs services, particul-
arly in the areas of information exchange and provision of technology to combat illegal ac-
tivity. The agreement is expected to increase effectiveness in the efforts to combat the tr-
ade in counterfeit goods.
¥q¡@ªk¡@³ø¡@¾É
Judicial Report
7¡B¬ü°êCAFC§@¥X»P¡u§¡µ¥½×¡v¬ã§P¬ÛÃöªº«n§P¨M
¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°j¤W¶Dªk°|¡]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit¡ÐCAFC¡^©ó2000¦~11¤ë29¤é¡A¹ïFesto v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Ko-
gyo Kabashiki Co., Ltd.®×§@¥X¤F«¤j§P¨M¡A¥ç§Y»{¬°¤Z©ó¥Ó½Ð±M§Q¹Lµ{¤¤¯A¤Î¥i±M§Q©Ê²z¥Ñ(reason related to patent-
ability)×¥¿¹L¤§¤¸¥ó(©ÎºÙ¨î±ø¥ó)¡A¤£¦A¨ã¦³§¡µ¥½×¤§½dÃ¥(No Scope of Doc-
trine of Equivalents Available)¡C¬ü°ê³Ì°ªªk°|¥¼¨Ó¦pªG¤ä«ùCAFC¤§Æ[ÂI¡A«h¹ï±M§Q¹ê°È¥²±N²£¥Í¤@©wµ{«×¤§¼vÅT¡A¦]¦¹¨ä«áÄòµo®i»áȱo§^¤Hª`·N¡C
7.U.S. Federal Circuit Issues Major Patent Ruling
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the United States on 29 November 2000 handed down a major patent decision in the case of Festo v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabashiki Co., Ltd. The decision results in a
su-bstantial limitation on the scope and ap-plicability of the doctrine of equivalents. While the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to adopt the position of the Federal Circuit, future developments in this area will likely have a large impact on patent law and practice.
|