¤E¨÷¤C´Á¡@90¦~04¤ë16¤é

¥»¡@´Á¡@´£¡@­nHEADLINES

´¼°]Åv¿Ô°Ó·|ij§Ú¦V¬ü¤è»¡©ú§Ú«OÅ@´¼°]Åv¤§±¹¬I»P¨M¤ß

Taiwan Presents Positions During IPR Consu ltation with the U.S.

´¼¼z§½­×ªk©µªø±M§QÅv´Á¶¡

IPO Drafts Amendments to Extend Patent Terms of Protection

¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@°]²£Åv«OÅ@´Á¶¡±N­×¥¿¬°µÛ§@¤H¤§¥Í¦s´Á¶¡¤Î¨ä¦º¤`«á¤­¤Q¦~

Draft Submitted to Extend Copyright Term of Protection for Computer Programs 

¥xÆW¦U¦a¤èªk°|À˹î¸p¤K¤Q¤E¦~¿ì²z«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥ó±¡§Î

Statistics on IPR Investigations by District Court Prosecutors in 2000

´¼°]Åv¿Ô°Ó·|ij§Ú¦V¬ü¤è»¡©ú§Ú«OÅ@´¼°]Åv¤§±¹¬I»P¨M¤ß

¤¤¬ü´¼¼z°]²£Åv¿Ô°Ó·|ij©ó¤T¤ë¤G¤Q¤é¤Î¤G¤Q¤»¤é¦b¸gÀÙ³¡°ê»Ú¶T©ö§½Á|¦æ¡AÂù¤è´N§Ú°ê¥¿¶i¦æªº¥úºÐºÞ²z±ø¨Ò¯ó®×¡B±M§Qªk¤ÎµÛ§@Åvªk³¡¤À±ø¤å­×¥¿µ¥¤º®e¡A¥H¤Î§Ú°ê¬F©²¥´À»«I¥Ç´¼¼z°]²£Åvªº¦æ°Ê±¹¬I»P¦¨®Ä¡A¶i¦æ·N¨£¥æ´«¡C¯÷±N§Ú¤è¦^À³ºK­z¦p¤U¡G

(¤@)¦³Ãö¡u¥úºÐºÞ²z±ø¨Ò¡v¥ßªk¡G
¦³Ãö¥ßªk®Éµ{¡A¯ó®×¤º®e¤w©ó¤T¤ë¤G¤Q¤T¤é³¯³ø¦æ¬F°|¡A±NÄò¶i¦æ«áÄò¥ßªk¨ó°Ó¤u§@¡C¥t¦³Ãö»@³d¡A¤¤¬üªk¨î¤£¦P¡A¦pªG±Ä¦æ¦D¨Æ»@¡Aµ{§Ç¸û¬°Ác½Æ¡A¬°¨Ï¥DºÞ¾÷Ãö¯à§Ö³t¦³®Ä³B¸m¹H¤Ï¥»±ø¨Ò³W©wªÌ¡A¥»±ø¨Ò±Ä¨ú¦æ¬F»@¡F¥B¦b¤½Å¥·|¹Lµ{¤¤¡A¨Ã¥¼¦³Åv§Q¤H¹ÎÅé´£¥X²§Ä³¡A­Õ¦³¨ãÅéÃö¤Á«ØÄ³¡A§Ú¤è±N·|Ä~Äò·¾³q¡C¦¹¥~¡A¥»±ø¨Ò¤w¹ï¹Hªk¥Í²£¤§¾÷¨ã»P¥úºÐ²£«~­q¥ß¨S¦¬³W©w¡C

(¤G)¦³Ãö±M§Qªk«OÅ@´Á°ÝÃD¡G
¦b§Ú°ê¥[¤JWTO¤§«á¡A±N¿í·ÓWTO¡þTRIPS¬ÛÃö³W©w¡A¹ï¨Ì¤K¤Q¤T¦~¤@¤ë¤G¤Q¤@¤é­×¥¿¬I¦æ«e¤§±M§Qªk©Ò¼f©w¤§µo©ú±M§Q®×¡A±Nµ¹¤©¨ä±M§QÅv´Á­­¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤G¤Q¦~©¡º¡¤§«OÅ@¡F¥t·s¦¡¼Ë±M§QÅv´Á¶¡¡A¤]±N¨Ì¤K¤Q¤»¦~¤­¤ë¤C¤é­×¥¿¨´¥¼¬I¦æ¤§±M§Qªk¡A¥Ñ²{¦æ¤§¡u¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤Q¦~©¡º¡¡v§ï¬°¡u¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤Q¤G¦~©¡º¡¡v¡C¥Ø«e¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z§½¤w¬ãÀÀ±M§Qªk²Ä¤@¤T¥|±ø­×¥¿¯ó®×¡A¨Ã¤w¥l¶}¹L¤½Å¥·|ij¡A¸gÀÙ³¡±N¾¨³t³¯³ø¦æ¬F°|¶i¦æ«áÄò­×ªk¤u§@¡C

(¤T)¦³ÃöµÛ§@Åvªk­×¥¿¨Æ©y¡G
§Ú°ê¬ãÀÀ¤¤¤§µÛ§@Åvªk­×¥¿¯ó®×¡A±N·|°w¹ï¬ü¤è©Ò´£·~ªÌ¤§®Ñ­±·N¨£¦X¨Ö¨ä¥L¦U¬É·N¨£¦Ò¶q¡A¯ó®×³Ì«á¤º®e±N²Å¦XTPIPS¼Ð·Ç»P°ê»Ú³W½d¡C¥tµÛ§@Åvªk¤¤¦³Ãö¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@«OÅ@°ÝÃD¡A¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½¤w¬ãÀÀ­×­q²{¦æµÛ§@Åvªk²Ä¤T¤Q¥|±ø²Ä¤@¶µ¯ó®×¡A±N¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@°]²£Åv«OÅ@´Á¶¡­×¥¿¬°µÛ§@¤H¤§¥Í¦s´Á¶¡¤Î¨ä¦º¤`«á¤­¤Q¦~¡A¨Ã±N¾¨³t³¯³ø¦æ¬F°|¶i¦æ­×ªk¤u§@¡C

(¥|)¦³Ãö§Ú°ê¬F©²¥´À»«I¥Ç´¼¼z°]²£Åvªº¦æ°Ê±¹¬I»P¦¨®Ä¡G
§Ú¤è¦^À³¤w©ó¤T¤ë¤G¤Q¤é¦V¬ü¤è¥R¤À»¡©ú§Ú¦U¬F©²¾÷Ãö¹L¥h°õ¦æ¥´À»µsª©¤§§V¤O»P¦¨®Ä¡A¦p¬ü¤è¤´¦³ºÃ¼{¡AÅwªï´£¥X¡C

Taiwan Presents Positions During IPR Consu ltation with the U.S.

Intellectual property consultations were held betwe en Taiwan and the United States on 20 March 2001 and 26 March 2001 in Taipei focusing on Taiwan's draft Optical Media Management Law and proposed amendments to Taiwan's Patent Law and Copyright Law. Both sides also discussed the enforcement measures Taiwan has taken to protect intellectual property rights. A sum mary of Taiwan's position during the bilateral consu
ltations is as follows:
a. Optical Media Management Law The draft law was forwarded to the Executive Yuan on 23 March 2001. After approval, the draft law will be submitted to the Legislative Yuan for co nsideration. Regarding the incorporation of cri minal penalties into the law, Taiwan pointed out that the legal systems of Taiwan and the United States are not the same. If Taiwan adopted crimi
nal penalties, the procedure for punishing viol ators would become relatively complicated. Thus, the draft law adopts administrative penalties in order that violators can be punished quickly and efficiently. 
Taiwan's representatives noted that there was no opposition to the adoption of administration penalties voiced by groups representing rights owners during the course of public hearing on the proposed law. Taiwan welcomed any concrete suggestions in this regard and promised to keep open the channels of communication. Taiwan noted that the draft law includes provisions regarding the confiscation of production equipment and optical media products.
b. Term of Patent Protection
After Taiwan accedes to the World Trade Organization, Taiwan will observe the requirements of TRIPS. Thus, invention patents granted prior to the enforcement of the 21 January 1994 amended Patent Law will be accorded terms of protection of 20 years from the date of filing. New design patents will be accorded protection under the amended, but not enforced, 7 May 1997 Patent Law. Thus, the term of protection for new design patents will be extended from ten to 12 years. These revisions are contained in an amendment to Article 134 of the Patent Law drafted by the Intellectual Pr
operty Office. The IPO has already held public hearings on the proposed amendment. The Ministry of Economic Affairs plans to submit the amendment at the earliest possible date to the amendment to the Executive Yuan for later consideration by the Legislative Yuan.
c. Copyright Law Amendment 
Taiwan is considering amending the Copyright Law, taking into consideration written comments from U.S. industry as well as opinions from others. The contents of the final draft will conform with TRIPS standards and international norms. In addition, the IPO has drafted an amendment to paragraph 1 of Article 34 of the Copyright Law to extend the term of protection of computer programs to the life of the author plus 50 years. This amendment has already been presented to the Executive Yuan.

d. Enforcement Issues
On 20 March 2001, Taiwan's representations provided details to the U.S. on the measures implemented as well as the results obtained regarding Taiwan's ant piracy efforts. The Taiwan representatives welcomed the U.S. side to provide comments if they had any doubts about these efforts. 

2.´¼¼z§½­×ªk©µªø±M§QÅv´Á¶¡

¬°²Å¦XWTO/TRIPS²Ä¤T¤Q¤T±ø¡u±M§QÅv´Á¶¡¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_¡A¦Ü¤Ö¤G¤Q¦~¡v¡A¤Î²Ä¤C¤Q±ø²Ä¤G¶µ¡u·|­û¹ï©ó¾A¥Î¥»¨ó©w¤§¤é¤w¦s¦b¥B¤w¨ü·|­û«OÅ@©Î¤é«á²Å¦X«OÅ@­n¥ó¤§¼Ðªº¡A¥ç¾A¥Î¤§¡vµ¥¬ÛÃö±M§QÅv´Á¶¡³W©w¡A¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½¤w©ó¤é«eÀÀ©w±M§Qªk²Ä¤@¦Ê¤T¤Q¥|±ø­×¥¿¯ó®×±ø¤å¡A¨Ã©ó¤E¤Q¦~¤T¤ë¤G¤Q¤G¤é¥l¶}¤½Å¥·|¡A­Ú³Õ¼x«Ø¨¥¡A¨Ñ­×¥¿¤§°Ñ¦Ò¡C
¬O¶µ¯ó®×±N±M§Qªk²Ä¤@¦Ê¤T¤Q¥|±ø²Ä¤G¶µ­×¥¿¬°¡y¥»ªk¤¤µØ¥Á°ê¤K¤Q¤T¦~¤@¤ë¤G¤Q¤@¤é­×¥¿¬I¦æ«e¡A¤w¼f©w¤½§i¤§±M§Q®×¡A¨ä±M§QÅv´Á¶¡¤§­pºâ¡A¨Ì­×¥¿«e¤§³W©w¿ì²z¡C¦ýµo©ú±M§Q®×¡A©ó¥@¬É¶T©ö²Õ´¨ó©w¦b¤¤µØ¥Á°êºÞÁҰϰ줺¥Í®Ä¤§¤é¡A±M§QÅv¤´¦sÄòªÌ¡A¨ä±M§QÅv´Á­­¡A¨Ì­×¥¿«á¤§³W©w¿ì²z¡C¡z¡A¤Î¼W­q²Ä¤T¶µ¡y·s¦¡¼Ë±M§Q®×¡A©ó¥@¬É¶T©ö²Õ´¨ó©w¦b¤¤µØ¥Á°êºÞÁҰϰ줺¥Í®Ä¤§¤é¡A±M§QÅv¤´¦sÄòªÌ¡A¨ä±M§QÅv´Á­­¡A¨Ì¤¤µØ¥Á°ê¤K¤Q¤»¦~¤­¤ë¤C¤é­×¥¿«á¤§³W©w¿ì²z¡C¡z³W©w
«ö¸Ó¯ó®×¡A¹ï©ó§Ú°ê¥[¤JWTO®É¡A¨Ì¤K¤Q¤T¦~¤@¤ë¤G¤Q¤@¤é­×¥¿¬I¦æ«e¤§±M§Qªk©Ò¼f©w¤§µo©ú±M§Q®×¡A±M§QÅv¤´¦sÄòªÌ¡AÀ³µ¹¤©¨ä±M§QÅv´Á­­¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤G¤Q¦~©¡º¡¤§«OÅ@¡C
¥t¦]©ó¤K¤Q¤»¦~¤­¤ë¤C¤é­×¥¿¨´¥¼¬I¦æ¤§±M§Qªk¡A±N·s¦¡¼Ë±M§QÅv´Á¶¡¡A¥Ñ²{¦æ¤§¡u¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤Q¦~©¡º¡¡v­×¥¿¬°¡u¦Û¥Ó½Ð¤é°_ºâ¤Q¤G¦~©¡º¡¡v¡A¨ÌWTO/TRIPS²Ä¤C¤Q±ø²Ä¤G¶µ¤§³W©w¡A©ó§Ú°ê¥[¤JWTO¤§¤é¡A¤´¦sÄò¤§·s¦¡¼Ë±M§QÅv¡A¥çÀ³¨Ì¤K¤Q¤»¦~¤­¤ë¤C¤é­×¥¿¤§±M§Qªkµ¹¤©«OÅ@¡C

IPO Drafts Amendments to Extend Patent Terms of Protection

The Intellectual Property Office recently completed proposed revisions to Article 134 of the Patent Law that will extend the terms of protection for inventi on patents and new design patents. The IPO has also held public hearings in order solicit input on the proposed changes.
The amendments are intended to bring Taiwan's patent terms of protection in conformance with requirements under TRIPS. Article 33 of TRIPS provides that "The term of protection available shall not end before the expiration of a period of twenty years counted from the filing date." Paragraph 2 of Article 70 of TRIPS provides "... this Agreement gives rise to obligations in respect of all subject matter existing at the date of application of this Agreement for the Member in question, and which is protected in that Member on the said date, or which meets or comes subsequently to meet the criteria for protection under the terms of this Agreement." 
The proposed amendment would revise the second paragraph of Article 134 as follows:
"For those patent cases which have been examined and published before the revision and enforcement of this Law on 21 January 1994, the computation of the term of the patent rights therefore shall be effected in accordance with the provisions in force prior to the revision of this Law; provided that the term of protection for invention patents still in effect on the date World Trade Organization agreements become effective in the territory under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China shall be effected in accordance with the provisions after the revision of this Law."
The proposed amendment also adds a new paragraph 3 to Article 134 as follows:
"The term of protection of new design patents still in effect on the date World Trade Organization agreements become effective in the territory under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China shall be effected in accordance with the provisions after the revision of 7 May 1997."
According to the draft amendment, invention patents would be provided with terms of protection of 20 years from the date of application if they Ƶ(were granted prior to the enforcement of the amendment of the Patent Law on 21 January 1994; and ƶ) were still in effect when Taiwan accedes to the WTO.
In addition, new design patents still in effect on the date that Taiwan accedes to the WTO will be afforded terms of protection according to the Patent Law as amended on 7 May 1997. Thus, the term of protection will be extended from ten years to 12 years in order to conform to paragraph 2 of Article 70 of TRIPS. 

¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@°]²£Åv«OÅ@´Á¶¡±N­×¥¿¬°µÛ§@¤H¤§¥Í¦s´Á¶¡¤Î¨ä¦º¤`«á¤­¤Q¦~

¬°¨Ï§Ú°êµÛ§@ÅvªkÃö©ó¹q¸£µ{¦¡¤§µÛ§@°]²£Åv«OÅ@´Á¶¡¤§³W©w¡A©ó¦ÛµM¤H¬°µÛ§@¤H¤§±¡§Î¡A±o¦sÄò¦ÜµÛ§@¤H²×¨­¤Î¨ä¦º«á¤­¤Q¦~¡A¥H²Å¦XWTO TRIPS²Ä¤Q±ø²Ä¤@¶µ³W©w¡A¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½¯S­×¥¿²{¦æµÛ§@Åvªk²Ä¤T¤Q¥|±ø²Ä¤@¶µ¦³Ãö¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@¤§µÛ§@°]²£Åv´Á¶¡¶È¦sÄò¦ÜµÛ§@¤½¶}µoªí«á¤­¤Q¦~¤§³W©w¡A¨Ï¹q¸£µ{¦¡µÛ§@¤§µÛ§@°]²£Åv´Á¶¡¦^Âk¾A¥Î²Ä¤T¤Q±ø¦Ü²Ä¤T¤Q¤T±ø¦³ÃöµÛ§@¤H¤§¥Í¦s´Á¶¡¤Î¨ä¦º¤`«á¤­¤Q¦~¤§«OÅ@´Á¶¡µ¥¤@¯ë³W©w¡C¸Ó¶µ­×¥¿¯ó®×¤w©ó¤T¤ë¤G¤Q¤T¤é§e³ø¸gÀÙ³¡Âà½Ð¦æ¬F°|¼f¬d¡C

Draft Submitted to Extend Copyright Term of Protection for Computer Programs 

The Ministry of Economic Affairs on 23 March 2001 sub
mitted a proposal to the Executive Yuan to amend the Copyright Law in order to extend the term of protecti
on for computer programs.
Under the draft amendment, paragraph 1 of Article 34 would be revised to provide a term of protection of works by natural authors to the life of the author plus fifty years. The current term of protection for works by natural authors is fifty years after the public release of the work. 
The amendment would place Taiwan's protection of com
puter programs in line with the requirements of para
graph 1 of Article 10 of TRIPS.

4.¥xÆW¦U¦a¤èªk°|À˹î¸p¤K¤Q¤E¦~¿ì²z«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥ó±¡§Î

¨Ì¾Úªk°È³¡°ªÀ˸p²Î­p¸ê®Æ¡A±N¤K¤Q¤E¦~«I®`´¼²£Åv®×¥ó°»¿ì¡Bµô§P½T©w¤Î°õ¦æ±¡§Îµ¥·J¾ã¤Îªí­z¦p¤U¡G

(1)¤K¤Q¤E¦~«×°»¿ì«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥ó±¡§Î¡G
—A°»¬d·s¦¬7,059¥ó¡A¤ñ¤K¤Q¤K¦~«×¼W¥[2,012¥ó¡F¥H¸o¦W¤ÀªR¡A¦¹Ãþ®×¥ó¤j¦h¬°¹H¤ÏµÛ§@Åvªk¡A­p4,887¥ó¦û69.23¢H¡A¹H¤Ï°Ó¼Ðªk1,673¥ó¡A¦û23.70¢H¡A¹H¤Ï±M§Qªk499¥ó¡A¦û7.07¢H¡C
—B°»¬d²×µ²6,571¥ó¡A¡]³Q§i8,252¤H¡^¡A¤ñ¤K¤Q¤K¦~«×¼W¥[1,815¥ó¡]³Q§i¼W¥[1,791¤H¡^¡A¨ä¤¤°_¶D³Q§i3,648¤H¡A¦û°»¬dµ¸µ²³Q§i¤H¼Æ44.21¢H¡F°_¶D®×¥ó¦³¨ãÅé¨D¦DªÌ152¥ó¡A¦û°_¶D¥ó¼Æ4.68¢H¡C¡]¸Ô²Ó¸ê®Æ¦pªþªí¤@¡^
(2)¤K¤Q¤E¦~«×°»¿ì«I®`´¼¼z°]²£Åv®×¥óµô§P½T©w¤Î°õ¦æ±¡§Î¡G
—Aµô§P½T©w³Q§i¤H¼Æ2,592¤H¡A¤ñ¤K¤Q¤K¦~«×¼W¥[655¤H¡A¨ä¤¤§P¨M¤@¦~¥H¤WªÌ254¤H¡A¤@¦~¥¼º¡¹O¤»¤ëªÌ89¤H¡A¤»¤ë¥H¤U917¤H¡A©ë§Ð126¤H¡A»@ª÷61¤H¡A¬ì¦D²v¬°55.83¢H¡A¤ñ¤K¤Q¤K¦~«×¤§39.34¢H¡A¼W¥[16.49¢H¡C¡]¸Ô²Ó¸ê®Æ¦pªþªí¤G¡^
—B¤w°õ¦æ§P¨M¦³¸o®×¥ó747¥ó¡A³Q§i798¤H¡]¤ñ¤K¤Q¤K¦~«×¼W¥[277¤H¡A³Q§i¼W¥[299¤H¡^¡A¨ä¤¤§P¨M6­Ó¤ë¥H¤U¦³´Á®{¦D¤Î©ë§Ð±o©ö¬ì»@ª÷ªÌ669¥ó¡]³Q§i717¤H¡^¡A°õ¦æµ²ªG¡G­ã©ö¬ì»@ª÷ú²MªÌ678¤H¡A¦û±o©ö¬ì»@ª÷¤H¼Æ94.56¢H¡A¤£­ã©ö¬ì»@ª÷ªÌ2¤H¡A¦û±o©ö¬ì»@ª÷¤H¼Æ0.28¢H¡C¡]µù¡G¥þ³¡¤w°õ¦æ¦³¸o®×¥ó­ã©ö¬ì»@ª÷ªÌ¦û±o©ö¬ì»@ª÷Á`¤H¼Æ80.78¢H¡A¤£­ã©ö¬ì»@ª÷ªÌ¶È¦û0.09¢H¡^¡C¡]¸Ô²Ó¸ê®Æ¦pªþªí¤T¡^

Statistics on IPR Investigations by District Court Prosecutors in 2000

According to information provided by the Ministry of Justice, statistics on IPRrelated investigations by Taiwan District Cou
rt prosecutors, indictments, affirmed sentences, and converted sentences in 2000 are as follows.
a. Actions by Taiwan District Court Prosecutors in IPR Cases.
(a) District Court prosecutors received 7,059 new IPRrelated cases in 2000, an increase of 2,012 cases compared to the same period of the prior year. Of the new cases, 4,887(69.23%) invo
lved copyrights, 1,673(23.70%) trademarks, and 499(7.07%) patents.
(b) Prosecutors concluded investigations on a total of 6,571 cases, involving 8,252 suspects, an increase of
1,815 cases and 1,791 suspects from a year earlier. Of the 8,252 suspects, indictments were handed down for 3,648(44.21%) persons. Convictions were obtained against 152(4.68%) of these indictment cases. (Please refer to table 1)
b. Affirmed Decisions and Sentence Conversions in IPR related Cases.
(a) There were 2,592 defendants in IPR related cases that were affirmed in 2000. No further appeals are allowed in these cases. The number was an increase of 655 defendants from a year earlier. Of these 2,592 defendants, 254 persons were convicted and sentenced to at least one year. 89 were sentenced to more than six months but less than one year, with 917 defend
ants sentenced to six months or under. A total of 126 persons were sentenced to detention while 61 were fined. Of the total number of those convicted in 2000, 55.83% received jail terms, detention, or fines, or an increase of 16.49 percentage points over the figure of 39.34% of a year earlier. (Please refer to table 2)
(b) Decisions for a total of 747 cases involving 798 defendants were enforced in 2000. These figures are increases of 277 cases and 299 defendants from a year earlier. Of the cases in 2000, 669 cases were enforced for 717 defendants sentenced to six months or under, or detention. In these cases, defendants could apply to convert their sentences to fines. Of these cases, 678 persons (94.56%) were allowed to convert their sentences to fines, while an application for 2 person (0.28%) was denied. (Note: For all criminal cases in the same period, 80.78% of defendants were eligible to convert sentences and only 0.09% of applications to convert sentences were denied. (Please refer to table 3)

ªþªí¡@Table(.doc)