¤E¨÷¤Q¥|´Á¡@90¦~07¤ë31¤é

¥»¡@´Á¡@´£¡@­nHEADLINES

WTO±´°Qºô¸ô´¼°]Åv
WTO Reviews Internet IPR
WCT¤ÎWPPT »P¼Ú·ù
WCT, WPPT and European Union
WIPO SCP°Q½×±M§Q¨î«×¤§¾ã¦X
WIPO's SCP Reviews Patent Rules
PCT±M§Q¥Ó½Ð¤§§ï­²
Reform of PCT Patent Application
WIPO¦¨¥ß¡u°ò¦]¸ê·½¡B¶Ç²Îª¾ÃѤΥÁ¶¡ÃÀ³N»P´¼¼z°]Åv¬F©²¶¡©e­û·|¡v
WIPO forms the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore
WIPO±NÁ|¿ì¡u¹q¤l°Ó°È»P´¼°]Åv¬ã°Q·|¡vWIPO
Conference on Electronic Commerce & Intellectual Property
WIPO 2000¦~°Ó¼Ð©M¥~Æ[³]­pµù¥U¥Ó½Ð¶q³Ð·s°ª
Record Year for WIPO Trademark and Industrial Designs Applications in 2000
WIPO 2000¦~PCT¥Ó½Ð¶q³Ð¾ú¥v¬ö¿ý
Record Year for PCT Applications with WIPO in 2000
°ê¤º±M§Q¥Ó½Ðµ{§Çº[³W¶O°ÊºA
Fees for Taiwan Patent Applications
¹q¾¹¦æ¥H¹q¸£¦ñ°Û¾÷¤½¶}ºt¥X¥L¤H­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¡AÄݦX²z¨Ï¥Î¤§¦æ¬°
Electrical Appliances Stores Publicly Perform Musical Works on Computer Karaoke Machines - Reasonable Use?

WTO±´°Qºô¸ô´¼°]Åv

¥@¬É¶T©ö²Õ´(WTO)¬°¦]À³½´«kµo®i¤§ºô»Úºô¸ô¹ï´¼°]Åv©Ò¥i¯à²£¥Íªº½ÄÀ»¡A©ó¤é«e°w¹ïWTO TRIPs¥[¥H°Q½×¡A¥]¬Aºô»Úºô¸ô¡uªk°|ºÞÁÒÅv¡v¡Bºô»Úºô¸ô´¼°]Åv«I®`¡Bºô°ì¦WºÙ»P°Ó¼Ð¡B¦a²z¼Ð¥Ü¤Î¨ä¥L¨ãÃѧO©Êªºªí¼x¤Îºô¸ô´¼°]Åv»P¤½¥­Ävª§µ¥¬ÛÃöª§Ä³¤Î¨ä¦³Ãö³W½d¾ã¦X¤§±´°Q¡C

WTO Reviews Internet IPR

In response to the impact that rapid developments of the Internet might have on intellectual property rights, the World Trade Organization (WTO) recently engaged in discussions concerning TRIPS. Topics reviewed include "legal jurisdiction" on the Internet, infringement of Internet IPRs, identifying marks such as domain names, trademarks and geographic identifications, Internet IPRs and fair competition, as well as reform of applicable regulations.

WCT¤ÎWPPT »P¼Ú·ù

½tºô¸ô©M¹q¤l°Ó°Èªº´¼¼z°]²£Åv«OÅ@°ÝÃD¡A¨Ï¾AÀ³¼Æ¦ì®É¥NµÛ§@Åvªk©M¾F±µÅvªkªº¡u¥@¬É´¼¼z°]Åv²Õ´µÛ§@Åv±ø¬ù¡]WCT¡^¡v©M¡u¥@¬É´¼¼z°]Åv²Õ´ªíºt©M¿ý­µ»s«~±ø¬ù¡]WPPT¡^¡v©ó1996¦~À³¹B¦Ó¥Í¡C³o¨â­Ó±ø¬ù±N¤À§O¦b¤T¤Q­Ó°ê®a§å­ã«á¥Í®Ä¡F¨´¤µ¤w¦³¤Q¤E­Ó°ê®a§å­ã¤FWCT¡A¤Q¤»­Ó°ê®a§å­ã¤FWPPT¡C2000¦~3¤ë¡A¼Ú·ù¥¿¦¡¨M©w¥[¤J³o¨â­Ó±ø¬ù¡A¨Ã¿n·¥«P¨Ï¼Ú¬wij·|¹{¥¬¦³Ãö§å­ã±ø¥O¡A³o¬O¼Ú·ù¤Î¨ä¦¨­û°ê§å­ã³o¨â­Ó±ø¬ùªº«e´£±ø¥ó¡C

WCT, WPPT and European Union

The WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) were created in 1996 to deal with the protection of Internet and E-Commerce IPRs. These 2 treaties deal with copyright and neighboring rights that are adapted to the digital era. These treaties are to take effect upon confirmation by 30 countrics respectively; so far 19 nations have confirmed the WCT, while 16 have confirmed the WPPT. In March 2000 the European Union officially decided to become a member to these 2 treaties, and has actively sought approval by the European Council, which was a precondition to the adoption of these 2 treaties by the European Union and its member countries.

WIPO SCP°Q½×±M§Q¨î«×¤§¾ã¦X

½t 2000¦~6¤ë³q¹Lªº±M§Qªk±ø¬ù(Patent Law Treaty, PLT)¡A¶È²Î¤@¤F¦U°ê©M¦U¦a°Ï±M§Q¥Ó½Ðµ{§Ç¤ÎºûÅ@µ{§Ç¡F¦Ó±M§Q¦X§@±ø¬ù(Patent Cooperation Treaty, PCT)¤]¥u¬O¹ïPCTªº¥Ó½Ð°µ¤F³W©w¡A¦ý¦b¶i¤J°ê®a¶¥¬q«á¡A´N¥Ñ¦U½l¬ù°ê¨M©w¬O§_±Â¤©±M§QÅv¡C¬GWIPO±M§Qªk±`©e·|(Standing Committee on the Law of Patent, SCP) »{À³¨ó½Õ¦U¤£¦P±M§Q¨î«×¡A¥H«K´î»´¦U°ê±M§Q§½ªº¤u§@¶q¡A­°§C°ê»Ú±M§Q«OÅ@ªº¶O¥Î¡C
±`©e·|¨M©w²Ä¤@¶¥¬qªº­«ÂI¬O¹ï½T©w¤@¶µµo©ú¬O§_¥i¥Hµ¹¤©±M§Q«OÅ@ªº¤»¶µªk«ß­ì«h¡A§YÀu¥ýÅv¡B·s¿o©Ê¡B³Ð³y©Ê¡B¤u·~¹ê¥Î©Ê¡B¥R¤À¤½¶}¥H¤ÎÅv§Q­n¨Dªºµ²ºc»P¸ÑÄÀµ¥¥æ´«·N¨£¡F²Ä¤G¶¥¬q¬O¦b2001¦~11¤ëªº·|ij¤W°Q½×²Ä¤@¥Ó½Ð¤H»P²Ä¤@µo©ú¤H¡B±M§Q¥Ó½Ð¤Q¤K­Ó¤ë¤½¶}¤Î®Ö­ã±M§QÅv«á²§Ä³µ¥°ÝÃD¡C
±`©e·|©ó2000¦~11¤ë6¤é¦Ü10¤éÁ|¦æ²Ä¥|¦¸·|ij¡A°Q½×¤F«e´¦¦³Ãö¨ó½Õ¹êÅé±M§Qªkªº°ÝÃD¡A°£©ó2001¦~5¤ë14¤é¦Ü19¤éÁ|¦æ·|ij¡A¼fij¹êÅé±M§Qªk±ø¬ù¯ó®×¡A¨Ã±N©ó¦P¦~11¤ë¤W¦¯Ä~Äò¼fij¬O¶µ¯ó®×¡C

WIPO's SCP Reviews Patent Rules

WIPO passed the Patent Law Treaty (PLT) in June 2000, which introduced a uniform system of patent application and protection for member nations. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) also regulates application for participating in the PCT. However, once the process enters the domestic level, it is up to each member nation to determine whether patent rights would be granted. Therefore WIPO's Standing Committee on the Law of Patent (SCPT) believes that there should be uniformity in each nation's patent systems, so as to reduce the workload of national patent offices and reduce the costs of international patent protection.
The SCPT's focus in stage one was to exchange views concerning the 6 legal principles that determine whether patent should be granted in respect of an invention, i.e. priority, novelty, inventiveness, industrial utility, full disclosure and the structure and interpretation of the patent claims. In the second stage, WIPO will hold discussions during the meeting in November 2001 on such issues as the first applicant, first inventor, disclosure 18 months after patent application, and objections following grant of patent rights.
The SCPT held its 4th meeting from November 6 to 10, 2000 to discuss the coordination of substantive pate-
nt rules described above. A draft of substantive patent rules was reviewed during the meeting from May 14 to 19, 2001, and this review will be continued during its meeting scheduled for November of this year.

PCT±M§Q¥Ó½Ð¤§§ï­²

±M§Q¦X§@±ø¬ù¡]PCT¡^§ï­²©e­û·|©ó2001¦~5¤ë21¤é¦b¤é¤º¥Ë¶}·|°Q½×PCT±M§Q¥Ó½Ð§ï­²°ÝÃD¡A¥]¬A²¤Æ¥Ó½Ðµ{¦¡¥H´£°ª¥þ²y¥Ó½Ð¨t²Îªº®Ä²v¡B­°§C¥Ó½Ð¶O¤Î¥Ó½Ð¹q¤l¤Æµ¥¡F¦¹¥~¡A±NPCT±M§Q¥Ó½Ð§ï­²»P¥¿¥ÑWIPO±M§Qªk±`³]©e­û·|©Ó¾áªº¹êÅé±M§Qªk¨ó½Õ¤u§@¬Û¤@­P¡A¨ÏPCT»P±M§Qªk±ø¬ù¡]PLT¡^ªº±ø´ÚºÉ¥i¯àµ²¦X¦b¤@°_¡F¸ÓPCT§ï­²¤è®×±N©ó2001¦~9¤ë±ÀÂ˵¹PCTÁp·ù¤j·|¡C

Reform of PCT Patent Application

A meeting of the Committee on Reform of the PCT was held in Geneva on May 21, 2001. At the meeting, the Committee considered various changes and amendments to the PCT, such as to simplify and streamline certain procedures so as to enhance the efficiency of the global application system, to reduce the application costs, and to make electronic applications possible. It also discussed conforming PCT amendments to the Patent Law Treaty (PLT) reforms currently undertaken by the Standing Committee (SCPT), so that the provisions of the PCT and the PLT could be integrated where possible. A proposal for reform of the PCT will be made to the Assembly of the International Patent Cooperation Union (PCT Union).

WIPO¦¨¥ß¡u°ò¦]¸ê·½¡B¶Ç²Îª¾ÃѤΥÁ¶¡ÃÀ³N»P´¼¼z°]Åv¬F©²¶¡©e­û·|¡v

WIPO©ó¤é«e¦¨¥ß¤@­Ó¡u°ò¦]¸ê·½¡B¶Ç²Îª¾ÃѤΥÁ¶¡ÃÀ³N»P´¼¼z°]²£Åv¬F©²¶¡©e­û·|¡v¡A¨Ã©ó2001¦~4¤ë30¤é¦Ü5¤ë3¤é¦b¤é¤º¥ËÁ|²Ä¤@¦¸·|ij¡A¸Ó©e­û·|ªº¤u§@¥D­n¯A¤Î °ò¦]¸ê·½ªºÀò¨ú¤Î§Q¯qªº¤À¨É «OÅ@»P°ò¦]¸ê·½¬ÛÃöªº©Î¤£¬ÛÃöªº¶Ç²Îª¾ÃÑ¡B³Ð·s¤Î³Ð³y ¥]¬A¤â¤uÃÀ¤§¥Á¶¡ÃÀ³Nµ¥¤T­Ó¤è­±ªº´¼°]Åv°ÝÃD¡C

WIPO forms the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

WIPO recently established the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, which held its first meeting on April 30 to May 3, 2001 in Geneva. The work of this Committee will focus on 3 primary themes: access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing; protection of traditional knowledge, innovations and creativity, whether or not associated with those resources; and the protection of expressions of folklore, including handicrafts.

WIPO net­p¹º¶i¤J¹ê¬I¶¥¬q

WIPO 2001¦~¶}©l¥þ­±¹ê¬IWIPO¥þ²y¸ê°Tºô¡]WIPO net¡^­p¹º¡A¨Ã´N¹ê¬I­p¹º¤w©ó2000¦~12¤ë¤À§O»PIBM©MSITA¤½¥qñ©w¦X¦P¡C§Q¥Îñ¬ù¤½¥qºô¯¸¡B¤½¦@INTERNET¤Î¦yºÝ§Þ³N²Õ¦X¤§WIPO net¡A±N¦bWIPO¦¨­û°ê¤§¶¡«Ø¥ß°_¥þ²y´¼¼z°]²£Åv¸ê°Tºô¡CWIPO net­p¹º¥]¬A«Ø¥ßWIPO net¤¤¤ß¡A¹w­p©ó2001¦~9¤ë«Ø¦¨¡A©¡®É171­Ó°ê®aªº332­Ó¦³Ãö´¼¼z°]²£§½¥i¥H¨Ï¥ÎWIPO net ¤¤¤ßªºªA°È¡A¥Ø«e¬ù160­Ó§½¤w¸g³s±µ¨ìINTERNET¤W¡F¥t¬O¦bWIPOÁ`³¡«Ø¥ßºô¸ôªA°È¡A¬°¬ù156­Ó¥Ø«eÁÙ¨S¦³³s±µ¨ìINTERNET¤Wªº´¼¼z°]²£§½´£¨ÑINTERNET³s±µ¥H¤Î¹q¸£³]³Æµ¥¡A¾ã­Ó­p¹º¹w­p©ó2002¦~§¹¦¨¡C

WIPO net Enters Implementation Stage

WIPO began implementing its "WIPO net" project in 2001, and had entered into agreements with IBM and SITA relating to this project in December 2000. By utilizing the resources of these companies, public Internet and state-of-the-art technology, WIPO net will become a global intellectual property information network between WIPO's member nations. The WIPO net project includes establishing a WIPO net infrastructure by September 2001, which will enable 332 relevant intellectual property offices in 171 countries to utilize WIPO net's services. To date 160 intellectual property offices have already been connected to the Internet. Infrastructure will also be set up at the International Bureau of WIPO, providing computer facilities and Internet connectivity to 156 intellectual property offices that have not yet been connected to the Internet. The project is expected to be fully completed by 2002.

WIPO±NÁ|¿ì¡u¹q¤l°Ó°È»P´¼°]Åv¬ã°Q·|¡v

WIPO±N©ó2001¦~9¤ë19¤é¦Ü21¤é¦b¤é¤º¥ËÁ|¦æ²Ä¤G¦¸¡u¹q¤l°Ó°È»P´¼¼z°]²£Åv¬ã°Q·|¡v¡A°Q½×¹q¤l°Ó°È»P´¼¼z°]²£Åv»â°ì¦³Ãöªk«ß¡B§Þ³N©M¬Fµ¦¾É¦Vªº³Ì·s°ÊºA¡A¦³Ãö¸Ó¬ã°Q·|ªºÄ³µ{¡Bµo¨¥¤H¡B¶O¥Î¡B²Õ´¦w±Æµ¥¡A±N¦bWIPOºô¯¸µo¥¬¡C


WIPO Conference on Electronic Commerce & Intellectual Property

The "WIPO Second International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Intellectual Property" will be held in Geneva on September 19 to 21, 2001. The Conference will address the latest developments in E-commerce and intellectual property laws, technologies and policies. Information about the agenda, speakers, costs and organizational arrangements of the Conference will be released on the WIPO website.

WIPO 2000¦~°Ó¼Ð©M¥~Æ[³]­pµù¥U¥Ó½Ð¶q³Ð·s°ª

WIPO 2000¦~¨Ì¾Ú°¨¼w¨½¨ó©w¨ü²z¤Fªñ23000¥ó°ê»Úµù¥U°Ó¼Ð¥Ó½Ð¡A¤ñ1999¦~¼Wªø¤F15%¡A¨C¥ó°Ó¼Ð¥­§¡«ü©w12­Ó°ê®a¡A¤W­z°Ó¼Ð¥Ó½Ð¼Æ¶q¬Û·í©ó276000¥ó°ê®aµù¥U°Ó¼Ð¥Ó½Ð¡C¦Ó°Ó¼Ðµù¥U¥Ó½Ð¶q³Ì¦hªº°ê®a¨Ì§Ç¬°¼w°ê¡Bªk°ê¡B²üÄõ¡B¤ñ§Q®É¡B¿c´Ë³ù¡B·ç¤h¡B¸q¤j§Q¡B¶ø¦a§Q¡B¦è¯Z¤ú¡B­^°ê¡B·ç¨å©M±¶§J¦@©M°êµ¥¡C¦P¦~WIPO¨ü²zªº°ê»Ú¤u·~«~¥~Æ[³]­pµù¥U¥Ó½Ð­p4334¥ó¡A¤ñ1999¦~¼Wªø6%¡A«e¤Q¦W¤À§O¬OInteror's¡BSwatch¡BSony Overseas¡BDaimler-Chrysler¡BKoninklijke Philips Electronics¡BSalomon¡BHermes Sellier¡BBMW¡BKoziol Geshenkartikel¤ÎUnilever µ¥¤½¥q¡C

Record Year for WIPO Trademark and Industrial Designs Applications in 2000

In 2000, WIPO accepted almost 23,000 international applications of trademarks under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol, representing an increase of 15% from 1999. As each international application contained on average 12 designations of the countries, this is equivalent to over 276,000 national trademark applications. The largest numbers of applications were received from Germany, France, Benelux, Switzerland, Italy, Austria, Spain, the United Kingdom, Sweden and the Czech Republic. In 2000 WIPO also accepted 4,334 international industrial design applications, representing an increase of 6% from the previous year. The 10 companies with the greatest number of industrial design applications are: Interior's, Swatch, Sony Overseas, Daimler-Chrysler, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, Salomon, Hermes Sellier, BMW, Koziol Geshenkartikel and Unilever.

WIPO 2000¦~PCT¥Ó½Ð¶q³Ð¾ú¥v¬ö¿ý

WIPO 2000¦~¦@¨ü²z90948¥óPCT¡]±M§Q¦X§@±ø¬ù¡^°ê»Ú¥Ó½Ð¡A¸û1999¦~¼Wªø22.9%¡A³Ð¾ú¥v¬ö¿ý¡C¬ü¡B¼w¡B¤é¡B­^¤Îªkµ¥°êªºPCT¥Ó½Ð¥ó¼Æ©Ò¥e¤ñ¨Ò¨Ì§Ç¬°42%¡B13.2%¡B10.3%¡B 6.1%¡B4.0%¡A¨Ã³sÄò10¦~¦ì©~«e­T¡C¦P¦~PCT°ê»Ú¥Ó½Ð¦b¦U­Ó§Þ³N»â°ìªº¤À§G±¡ªp¤À§O¬O¤Æ¾Ç¡B§Mª÷20.9%¡A¤HÃþ¥Í¬¡»Ý­n18.4%¡Aª«²z18.0%¡A¹q¾Ç17.6%¡A§@·~¡B¹B¿é14.8%¡A¾÷±ñ¤uµ{¡B·Ó©ú¡B¥[¼ö¡BªZ¾¹¡BÃz¯} 6.1%¡A©T©w«Ø¿vª«2.8%¡A¯¼Â´¡B³y¯È1.4%¡C
(¥H¤W³ø¾É·J¾ã¦Û¤¤°ê¤j³°°ê®aª¾ÃѲ£Åv§½ºô¯¸®ü¥~¶Ç¯u¸ê®Æ)

Record Year for PCT Applications with WIPO in 2000

In 2000 WIPO processed 90,948 international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), a record high representing a 22.9% increase from 1999. Applicants from the USA (42% of all applications in 2000), Germany (13.2%), Japan (10.3%), the United Kingdom (6.1%) and France (4.0%) topped the list of biggest users of the PCT system for the 10th consecutive year. A breakdown of PCT applications filed in 2000 according to industrial categories is Chemistry and metallurgy 20.9%; Human necessities 18.4%; Physics 18.0%; Electricity 17.6%; Performing operations and transporting 14.8%; Mechanical engineering, lighting, heating, weapons and blasting 6,1%; Fixed constructions 2.8%; Textiles and paper 1.4%.
(The above reports are compiled from information released by the PRC Intellectual Property Office website)

°ê¤º±M§Q¥Ó½Ðµ{§Çº[³W¶O°ÊºA

¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½©ó¤é«eÀÀ¨ã¡u±M§Q³W¶O¦¬¶O·Ç«h¡v­×¥¿¯ó®×¡A°£±N¯ó®×µn¸ü©ó¸Ó§½¬ÛÃöºô¯¸¡]http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/sub6/¡^¡A¨ÃÀÀ©ó¤K¤ë¥÷°²¸Ó§½Á|¿ì¤½Å¥·|¡AÅ¥¨ú¦³Ãö¦U¬É«Ø¨¥¡A­Ú§@¬°­×¥¿¤§°Ñ¦Ò¡C
¦¹¥~¡A¸Ó§½©ó¥Á°ê¤E¤Q¦~¤C¤ë¤Q¤K¤é¥H¡]¤E¡³¡^´¼ªk¦r²Ä¡³¤E¡³¤K¤»¡³¡³¡³¤»¤C-¡³¸¹¨ç¤½§i¡u±M§Q¥Ó½Ðµ{§ÇÃP¸j¨Æ¶µ¡v(http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/ipo.asp?sub=6)¦Û§Y¤é°_¬I¦æ¡C«e´¦ÃP¸j¨Æ¶µ¥]¬A«Å»}®Ñ»P¥Ó½ÐÅvÃÒ©ú®Ñ¤§Ã±¸p¥~°ê¤½¥q¥Ó½Ð¤§¥Nªí¤H¤Î©e¥ôñ¸pÄ~©ÓÃÒ©ú¤å¥ó™D«Å»}®Ñ¤Î¥Ó½ÐÅvÃÒ©ú®Ñ¤§¸É¥¿¤Î®i´Á¤§¥Ó½Ð™EµL«Å»}®Ñ¤Î¥Ó½ÐÅvÃÒ©ú®Ñ¡A¬ÛÃö¤Áµ²®Ñ¤Î¬ÛÃöÃÒ©ú¤å¥ó¤§À˪þ™F±M§QÅv©Î¥Ó½ÐÅvÅý»Pµn°O¥Ó½Ð¤§Âù¤è¥Nªíñ¸pµ¥¡C
¥t¸Ó§½¨Ì¾Ú¤é«e¥l¶}¤§Â²¤Æ¡u¿é¥XµøÅ¥µÛ§@¤Î¥N¤uÅJ®g°Û¤ù®ÖÅçµÛ§@Åv¤å¥ó§@·~¡v·|ij¤§¨Mij¡A©ó¤C¤ë¤Q¤»¤é¤½§i¼o¤î¡u¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½¾n°ò¶©®ÖÅ礤¤ß³]¸m¤ÎºÞ²z­nÂI¡v¡C

Fees for Taiwan Patent Applications

The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) of Taiwan recently prepared draft amendments to the Patent Application Fees Schedule, which will be posted on its website (http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/sub6/). It will also hold a public hearing in August at its offices to receive public suggestions concerning the amendments.
The IPO has also announced that Relaxed Items in Patent Application Procedures (http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/ipo.asp?sub=6)will be in effect as of July 18, 2001 (by its Letter (90) Chi-Fa-0908600067-0). Items relaxed include¡G (a) signing of oaths and applicant certifications; (b) signing of application and powers of attorney by representatives of foreign companies; (c) certifications of assignments; (d) supplementation of oaths and applicant certifications, and applications for extensions; (e) attachment of undertakings and relevant supporting documentation, where oaths and applicant certifications are unavailable; (f) assignment of patent or application right, and signing by representatives of both parties.
In addition, according to the decision of the meeting on "Procedures for Examination of Copyright Documentation for Exported Audiovisual Works and OEM Laser Disks" held by the IPO, the Establishment and Management Rules for the Keelung Examination Center of the IPO will be abolished as of July 16 by public gazette.

¹q¾¹¦æ¥H¹q¸£¦ñ°Û¾÷¤½¶}ºt¥X¥L¤H­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¡AÄݦX²z¨Ï¥Î¤§¦æ¬°

°w¹ï¹q¾¹¦æ¥H¹q¸£¦ñ°Û¾÷¡u¥u¼½©ñ­µ¼Ö¡AµL¤Hºt°Û¡v¤Î¡u¬°¤¶²Ðµ¹®ø¶OªÌ¸Ó¹q¸£¦ñ°Û¾÷¤§³nµwÅé¥\¯à¦ÓÀH¾÷ÂI¿ï¤@¡B
¤G­ººq¦±¸ò°Û¡v¬O§_ÄÝ¡u¤½¶}ºt¥X¡v­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¤§¦X²z¨Ï¥Î¦æ¬°¡H¸gÀÙ³¡´¼¼z°]²£§½©ó¤E¤Q¦~¤»¤ë¤Q¤K¤é¥H¡]¤E¤Q¡^´¼µÛ¦r²Ä09060004790¸¹¨çªí¥Ü¡AµÛ§@Åvªk²Ä¤T±ø²Ä¤@¶µ²Ä¤E´Ú³W©w¡u¤½¶}ºt¥X¡v«Y«ü¡G¡u¥Hºt§Þ¡B»RÁСBºq°Û¡B¼u«µ¼Ö¾¹©Î¨ä¥L¤èªk¦V²{³õ¤§¤½²³¶Ç¹FµÛ§@¤º®e¡C¥HÂX­µ¾¹©Î¨ä¥L¾¹§÷¡A±N­ì¼½°e¤§Án­µ©Î¼v¹³¦V¤½²³¶Ç¹FªÌ¡A¥çÄݤ§¡C¡v©Ò¼½°eªÌ­Y«Y¥L¤H¤§¡uµøÅ¥µÛ§@¡v¡A¦]µøÅ¥µÛ§@¨ÃµL¤½¶}ºt¥X¤§Åv¯à¡A¶ÈÄݵøÅ¥µÛ§@¤§¡u¤½¶}¤W¬M¡v¡A­Y©Ò¼½¥XªÌ¶È«Y­µ¼Ö¡A«hÀ³Äݤ½¶}ºt¥X¥L¤H­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¤§¦æ¬°¡C
¬d¬ü°êµÛ§@Åvªk²Ä¤@¤@¡³±ø²Ä¤C¶µ³W©w¡A¦b¹ï¥~¶}©ñ¥B¥¼ª½±µ©Î¶¡±µ¦¬¨ú¶i³õ¶O¥Î¤§Àç·~³õ©Ò¤º¡A¥B¼½©ñ­µ¼Ö¤§¥Øªº­Y¶È«Y¬°«P¾P°Û¤ù©ÎµøÅ¥²£«~¡A«h¸Ó¤½¶}ºt¥X­µ¼Ö¤§¦æ¬°¥i»{¬°«Y­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¤§¦X²z¨Ï¥Î¡F§Ú°êµÛ§@Åvªk²Ä¤»¤Q¤­±ø²Ä¤G¶µ¥ç©ú©w¦³¡u¨ä¥L¦X²z¨Ï¥Î¡v¤§·§¬A©Ê³W©w¡A¤W­z¹q¾¹¦æ¤º¥H¹q¸£¦ñ°Û¾÷¤½¶}ºt¥X¥L¤H­µ¼ÖµÛ§@¤§¦æ¬°¡A
°Ñ°u¥~°ê¥ßªk¨Ò¡A¥çÀ³¦³¦X²z¨Ï¥Î¤§ªÅ¶¡¡A¨Ñ§Q¥Î¤H§K±ÂÅv¦Ó±o§Q¥ÎµÛ§@¡C


Electrical Appliances Stores Publicly Perform Musical Works on Computer Karaoke Machines - Reasonable Use?

Is it a "reasonable use" of a musical work for electrical appliances stores to "publicly perform" these works on computer karaoke machines? It is argued that these machines "only play music without the actual singing", and "consumers pick one or two songs to sing along, only for the purposes of being shown the functionality of the hardware and software of the karaoke machine". According to the explanatory letter issued by the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) of the MOEA on June 18, 2001 (ref. 2001-Chi-Chu-09060004790), "public performance" under Sub-par. 9, Par. 1, Article 3 of the Copyright Law refers to: "Communicating the contents of a work to members of the general public present by acting, dancing, singing, playing an instrument or other means. The same applies to the communication of originally broadcasted sound or images to the general public by means of an amplifier or other equipment." If the subject matter of the broadcast is another person's "audio-visual work", then since it is not possible to publicly perform an audio-visual work, it can only be considered a "public screening" of the audio-visual work. If the subject matter being broadcasted is music alone, it should be considered public performance of another person's musical work.
Pursuant to Section 110(7) of the U.S. Copyright Act, an act of public performance of a musical work is deemed reasonable use of the work, if it is performed within a place of business that is open to the public and which does not directly or indirectly charge for entry, and the purpose for playing the music is to promote music albums or audio-visual products. Par. 2, Article 65 of the Taiwanese Copyright Law also contains a general provision regarding "other reasonable use". Based on legal examples overseas, it is possible that the public performance by electrical appliances stores of other people's musical works can be considered a "reasonable use", and it is not necessary for use of the work to be separately licensed.